December 29, 2011

Biggest property news in Malaysia in 2011 Part 2

This is the continuation from my first blogpost on the 'Biggest Property News in Malaysia in 2011 Part 1'. In the first part, the issues were about affordable houses; the effect of MRT on the land cost and the tussle between the landowners and the MRT Corporation on the land acquisition process. The second part covers some of the news affecting investors in 2011 and the few mega property projects in the Klang Valley announced by the private sectors.

Here are four other property news in the limelight in 2011 :

5) 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) in the news

Announced in 2010 as a fully government-owned sovereign wealth management fund with various fingers in various pies including; a joint-venture with PetroSaudi International Limited to invest in oil and gas and real estate which has since made 1MDB, according to their website, RM425 Million profit through part divestment; the building of Kuala Lumpur International Financial District (KLIFD) in the 30 hectares of the Imbi area bordering Jalan Tun Razak, Jalan Sultan Ismail and the MEX highway and the building of Bandar Malaysia at the current Sungai Besi airport which will offer affordable houses.

1MDB was in the news at the end of 2011 due to the funding that they were said to have received from the government a subsidy of RM1.11 billion in the 2012 Budget although they raised a sukuk worth RM5 billion in 2009; the lack of work on KLIFD; and the acquisition of the 495-acre land parcel which was the Royal Malaysia Arm Force (RMAF) Sg. Besi airport which will be turned into Bandar Malaysia. 

The first news is opposition's fodder which claimed that 1MDB seems to be getting funding which it does not need. The second news was finally put to rest with the tender process announced by 1MDB for major foundation work for KLIFD due to take off in early 2012. The last news ran smack into the competitive nature of other government agencies which have already been tasked with building such houses as the price of houses at Bandar Malaysia was announced to be between RM220,000-00 and RM300,000-00.

Here are links you can go through about 1MDB :

- 1MDB official website

- News about Bandar Malaysia in Sg. Besi
6) Return of the mega property projects

At the start of 2011, the mega projects seem to have lost some steam due to the property slowdown within the well-known area of the Golden Triangle of Kuala Lumpur, or so it seems. This happened even when someone bought a RM38 Million penthouse condominium at The Binjai on the Park near KLCC in middle of 2010. It seemed then that the days of the launches of mega property projects in Malaysia are numbered. Then a few announcements which made headlines dispelled this notion. Some of these property developments were old news with new owners or new managements. Some were new projects which seemed to have been planned a long time ago but were just recently launched in 2011. Here are two of the most notables mega property project launches in 2011.

There seemed to be a lot more of property launches as we entered the middle of 2011 as opposed to the quiet 2009 and 2010. It is so much so that banks have started to be choosy in giving out loans. One of it those that made the news was the launch of a new mega development project by NAZA TTDI of their KL Metropolis at where the Matrade building is now situated. Spanning 75.5 acres, it is envisioned itself as the new international trade and exhibition district. Developed in the span of 15 years, it will be done in 3 phases. The gross development value is estimated at RM15 Billion and was launched by the Prime Minister in October 2011.

SP Setia, once a favored property counter on Bursa Malaysia, has finally launched its long awaited KL Eco City in November 2011, which is located at a narrow piece of land at the former Kampung Haji Abdullah Hukum. Located at the opposite of the always busy Midvalley City, one can just imagine the hectic traffic situation of the area bordering Bangsar and the New Pantai Expressway, once it is completed. It will comprised of mixed-used commercial and residential properties which will be placed in a few towers within the 10.1 hectares of land. It is also said to be the first mixed-used commercial property to receive the currently sought after Malaysia Green Building Index (GBI) standard and will be completed in 10 years.

Links on the projects stated above and news on mega property projects :

- KL Metropolis website

- News on launch of KL Metropolis

- KL Eco City website

- News on the launch of KL Eco City

- Wrap up on mega property launches for 2011

7) Real Property Gain Tax

The tax treatment on the disposal of property was changed in 2010. Between April 2007 until the end of 2009, the Real Property Gain Tax (RPGT) was given a holiday. Due to the property market condition within those year, the move was done to fire up a lackluster property market as the world's economy took a tumble. When it was reintroduced in January 2010, the tax treatment for RPGT was totally a different animal than what it was  before April 2007.

Before April 2007, RPGT was tiered according to how long you have owned the property. RPGT is calculated based on the profit you make when you dispose of a property at a maximum of 30% within the first year of ownership but becomes 0% on the sixth year of ownership. This only applies to residential property. With commercial property, the amount of 5% from the profit will have to paid as RPGT even after the fifth year.

When it was reinforced (the law was never abolished but was just put on hold) in 2010, the tax treatment for the disposal of property was given a flat 5% tax from the profit you make if the sale was done within the first 5 year of ownership of the property. The way RPGT is collected also differs with a 2% of the transacted price has to be paid before being refunded by Lembaga Hasil Dalam Negeri once it is checked and cleared.

Now, in 2012, after it was announced in the 2012 Budget in October 2011, the RPGT was changed again. Starting from January 2012, RPGT will now be two-tiered. within the same vein when it was reintroduced in 2010, RPGT, which is taxed on any profit gained from the sale of a property will beat the rate of 10% for any disposal below 2 years of ownership. Any property disposed after 2 years of ownership but less than 5 years will still have a 5% levy but none will be levied after 5 years of ownership.

Links on the issue of RPGT :

- My blogpost on RPGT in 2012

- Official portal of LHDN

- Online brochure of RPGT by LHDN

8) Regulation for banks in giving out property loans

In 2011, as announced in Budget 2011, in order to slow down the overheating property market and to stop property speculator in damaging the economy of scale for genuine buyers, especially those who are in need of affordable houses, the government changed the rule on the amount of property loans given by financial institutions at any one time. Using Bank Negara Malaysia as the enforcer, financial institutions can only gives out housing loan in the margin of 70% for anyone who has more than 2 properties. It means that if someone who already has 2 properties bought using housing loans, the next property loan he takes will be limited to a margin of 70%. This does not deter anyone who is cash rich to buy more than two houses and still speculates.

The rule had affected sales of properties as only genuine buyers may now buy property and not speculators. The news of the change of how housing loan is given out by banks through a new ruling by Bank Negara Malaysia did not help, either. It was decided in not so many words, the criteria on the margin of loan and maybe the interest rate levied on a property loan will now change due to the way a housing loan application is calculated. On the table but not yet announced or implemented is the new rule where the calculation for an application of a housing loan will be based on nett income of a borrower and not the current usage of gross income. It may even means that one person or one household with incomes below RM5,000-00 can now only own one property below the price of RM300,000-00. It will be in line with the promotion of affordable houses by the government though.

The links on this not yet determined its accuracy news can be found below :

- News on the nett income calculation for housing loans

- Banks may offer more competitive home loans

- Round up of Budget 2012 on property and construction sectors

These are all the news I consider worthy to be mentioned as the biggest property news in Malaysia during 2011. Some are already being implemented and some are coming days. From what I see, there are only a few keywords to the news : Affordable houses and Curbing Speculations.


December 27, 2011

Biggest property news in Malaysia in 2011 Part 1

Everyone is doing a list, so why shouldn't I? Furthermore, 2011 has been an exciting year for the property market in Malaysia. Not every news is necessarily can be considered as good news. It seems that there are property news for everyone in Malaysia.

Those low-income group who never owns a house received various news about houses which they now can afford. Those who had just graduated and started working can now afford to buy a house. Those who have worked a few years and found it hard to buy property can now afford to do so. The business communities are getting new business enclaves. Speculators in property prices especially those who buys residential houses got their fair share of news too.

Let us go through these news which can be found the whole year of 2011 :

1) MRT finally got off the ground

Of course, one of the biggest news this year is when the government decided to finally integrate the public transportation system by having the Klang Valley Mass Rapid Transit (KVMRT) as the final piece in the puzzle that has never been completed properly. Klang Valley public transports are always fragmented with KTM's Komuter, LRT, Monorail and a few bus companies plying the route. Launching it in July 2011, after announcing it back in June 2010, Dato' Seri Najib, Prime Minister of Malaysia, said that he hopes that it will finally solve the woes of the city dweller by allowing them to park their car from wherever they are staying and ride public transport to work or wherever they need to be in the city.

The biggest news which came in light of the MRT project, among others were :

a) Its alignment as to where the train will passes and who will benefits from it;

b) Land acquisitions which had threaten a few heritage sites and the issue of land surface acquisition vs. underground land for the projects. Among notable cases which were filed in court due to this matter were by businesses in Jalan Sultan (Chinatown), Jalan Imbi and Jalan Bukit Bintang;

c) The possibility of the rise of land prices wherever the MRT will pass and the issue of MRT Corporation getting involved in property development;

d) The issue of the contracts awarded and whether the right companies were given the right jobs. This is one issue which will never fully resolved as this RM40 Billion project has so many interested parties.

Some news and link on MRT :

2)  My First Home Scheme

My First Home Scheme covers houses (first or second hand houses) between the price of RM100,000-00 to RM220,000-00 for first-time homeowner. In the 2012 Budget, the maximum price for this scheme has been raised to RM400,000-00. The scheme is given in the form of 100% housing loan provided by various financial institutions which include Maybank, CIMB Bank, Affin Bank and RHB Bank, among others. The 100% housing loan is due to the arrangement where the first 10% payment to buy the property will be guaranteed by Cagamas Berhad and has a maximum tenure of 30 years. This means that the 10% will be paid by Cagamas and the buyer will owe the amount to Cagamas. It is only open to Malaysia citizen below the age of 35 years old with household income of less than RM3,000-00. This scheme is already open for application and the executors for this scheme are the banks. You can check the scheme at any participating banks.

Here are some news and links on the My First Home Scheme

3) Perumahan Rakyat 1 Malaysia (PR1MA)

Launched in May 2011 and is known as 1Malaysia People's Housing Scheme/Perumahan Rakyat 1 Malaysia, hence the acronym PR1MA. Unlike the My First Home Scheme, the executor for this project is a new entity which acts much like a housing developer. It will identify locations around Malaysia and build houses for people who fulfill certain criteria. The corporation is called 1Malaysia Housing Program Corporation has been established and as of today, two projects have been launched under it. One is in Putrajaya and will be built by PR1MA itself and the other one is a joint venture between PR1MA and Sime Darby Property in Bandar Ainsdale, Seremban. The mode of allocating the property to the masses is through balloting.

The price of the houses in this scheme are between RM100,000-00 to RM220,000-00.  The criteria to be eligible for this scheme is that the applicant must be Malaysians who never own a house before (first time homebuyer) and has a household income of RM6,000-00. Some of the features for the houses build by PR1MA include the exemption of stamp duty, eligibility of 105% loan from selected financial institutions with the 5% to be utilised to pay insurance and legal fees and a lock-in period, where the housebuyers cannot sell the house within the first 10 years of ownership. An Act of Parliament has been enacted for this scheme and was passed in early December 2011.

Some links on PR1MA :

4) Syarikat Perumahan Negara Berhad to build 10,000 houses in 2012

The seemingly current bridesmaid's company to the government's effort in providing affordable houses. May even be asking itself why is it sidelined while these news on My First Home Scheme and PR1MA filtered in. At the end of 2011 SPNB can be seen to be back in the news. As explained by the Prime Minister when the PR1MA bill was tabled in early December, PR1MA will concentrate to build affordable hosing in the urban area whilst SPNB will still build affordable housing in the rural area. The statement by the PM is supposed to solved the problem on the overlapping functions of these two government agencies.

It was announced at the end of 2011, SPNB had signed an agreement with Bank Simpanan Nasional (BSN) which will provide financing for the 10,000 units of houses which SPNB had been tasked to build in 2012. The cost was estimated at RM650 Million with the government subsidisind the building of the houses with a RM200 Million subsidy and the balance will be financed with the housing loans provided. This is with each house estimated to cost around RM65,000-00.

For the past few years, SPNB has been offering affordable houses in a various categories which overlap what PR1MA has to offer. Among them were Rumah Mampu Milik (Affordable Houses) and Rumah Mesra Rakyat (Rakyat-friendly Houses). An example of the former is Alam Prima which is located in Section 22, Shah Alam and the latter can be found in various small town in Selangor such as Kuala Selangor and in rural areas in Sabah and Sarawak. SPNB is also the agency in charge to revive abandoned projects around the country and to act as the contractor to build more government quarters.

Depending on how you see it, there is a lot of overlap between the government agencies in providing affordable housing to the masses. One other question which beg an answer is how will the government ensure that nobody will abuse the offer of so many affordable houses by various government-linked companies. There is also the issue about the term of 'affordable housing' when the government raised the limit of My First Home Scheme's house price to RM400,000-00 and even now contemplating to raise the household income eligible for the scheme up to RM7,000-00.

The links on SPNB :

SPNB official website

- Vote buying using affordable houses

- New understanding between SPNB and BSN

My blogpost on affordable offered by Federal government and the Selangor state

December 2, 2011

klia2 : Why not?

I was invited to a briefing by Malaysia Airports (MAB) at the Courtyard Garden somewhere in Jalan Dungun, Kuala Lumpur. After braving the horrendous traffic and the heavy rain, I managed to arrive slightly before 8pm. The moment I stepped into the restaurant, I was surprised to see a familiar face which I have seen in various media before. It was the face of Tan Sri Bashir Ahmad, the CEO of MAB. Then as cards were exchanged, the names that I saw on the cards were surprising too as all the top managements of MAB were there. There were the Sr. GM of Operations, Dato' Azmi Murad and GM of Corporate Communications, Nik Anis, among others. It made me curious but excited for the session to start.

The moment the briefing starts, with Tan Sri Bashir taking the lead, I can say that it was a public relation effort by MAB with the social media. When I look around the room, I can see a few familiar faces like Christopher Tock, Patchay, Thomas Yap, Daniel Cerventus and Firdaus 'Feeq' to name a few who are part business, travel and lifestyle bloggers. As the briefing was going on, they were basically tweeting about what was unveiled in front of their eyes. The briefing was on the specifications of the new klia2 which will be completed in 2013. And it started with this Youtube video : 

After the video presentation, Tan Sri Bashir announced that there are no low cost terminal in the world for them to use as a reference, hence klia2 was built according to the need of the low cost operators such as AirAsia. Then Tan Sri Bashir gave us the facts and figures about the size of the terminal : 257,000; the contact stands : 68; the capacity to handle how many passengers : 45 Millions; the fully automated Baggage Handling System (BHS); a dedicated runaway (Runaway 3) an aerobridge (where plane can taxi below it to go from one side to another after landing and save time) and connectivity between KLIA and klia2. He also told us how MAB increased the capacity according to what is asked by AirAsia. The whole list of what klia2 has to offer can be found at MAB website : Latest News on klia2.

That was the kosher part of the briefing and as expected, questions came fast and quick with most of those who attended the event wanted to know what is the controversy that seems to be created by AirAsia. If you don't know anything about what is the stand-off between AirAsia and MAB is all about, read this blogpost by Tony Fernandes : Say no to airport tax increase and this report by Malaysian Insider about the issue (a two sided version and read the comment section to) : MAHB removes AirAsia anti-tax hike posters, stickers. So, this controversy is all about a hike of RM7-00 in contrast of us never knowing we had been paying airport tax through airlines we've flown in the pre-AirAsia era.

Here is my two sens worth. 

The new klia2? Nice and amazing. I was told they are trying to emulate Dubai and Changi. There's hotels, there's retail experience and good restaurants/food outlets. Good and well. Here's a question I asked and didn't really get an answer. Will you have a resting area like what Dubai and Changi have for those who doesn't want to pay any hotels or whatever additional cost. A settee or a reclining seat which you can sleep on for 2 to 3 hours and a bathroom with shower facilities and such. The answer was not fully given meaning, they may not have it. 

Then the issue with AirAsia. Sorry to say, I don't agree at all with AirAsia. This carrier thrive on every sen it collects from its consumer. Simple mathematics will show that they have been collecting additional charges without explaining why and which seems to go only into their pockets. And the eccentricities of its own, one Tony Fernandes which is trying so hard to be the next Richard Branson (whom he has a close relationship with) does not show any regards for others. Yes, he did bring low cost carrier in a big way into Asia but he is not the solve all, end all solutions. He still has a long way to go. And with an increase of airport tax, he is losing RM7-00 which he can play with to tax his next passenger. For all you know, anticipating an increase, he will increase his charges first. MAB is having a tough time as Tony is popular and a smart businessman.

I fly on leisure quite a lot and AirAsia is not my instant choice. I know people use AirAsia if they planned ahead and with their marketing strategy and their pay first, fly later promotion, they are quite popular. klia2 maybe relevant to be a better choice than the current LCCT but I may not be one of its frequent user when it comes into being. If the price increase of RM7-00 is to make sure klia2 will be a better terminal, for me, I would gladly accept it.

As for me, as I have tweeted after the briefing, what I find to be the best information I got from MAB is that a Victoria Secret's pop-up store has opened in the satellite building in KLIA. As for someone whose both kampungs are within the vicinity of both airports, I have long ago given up on having an airport which will benefit them as truthfully, it does not. Here is my long ago blogpost on the matter : How I lost my kampung...

November 17, 2011

Abandon housing project solution in Malaysia?

In Malaysia, there was once this institution called Danaharta. It was owned by the government. It goes around helping banks with high non-performing loans to manage and finally settled this problem. It was in existence from 1998 to 2005. It was a non-profit organisation with impossible Key Performance Index  and it managed to settled all the problems in the banking industry with an act enacted by Parliament. It saved a banking industry. It was ahead of its time. It was the brainchild of a genius in the government then and it was run by people who were really good at what they were picked for. Now, Danaharta has become Proharta and is a private entity. 

During the existence of Danaharta, it did got involved in abandon housing projects as Danaharta was given the power by Pengurusan Danaharta Nasional Berhad Act 1998 gives it the right to acquire, manage, finance and dispose of the assets and liabilities of a financial institution in trouble. And the bulk of the financial institutions that were in trouble were dealing with abandon housing projects. Although Danaharta was not established to save abandon projects, it became so. During the period of 1998 until nearly 2005 (even later), you can see Danaharta taking the advertisement spaces in major newspaper to sell off properties like factories, commercial properties and even residential. Danaharta was also known to revive abandon housing projects, clean up the management and sell it off too. It did made a tidy sum before closing down shop. 

Was before there was Danaharta, the Bank Negara Malaysia also had an entity called Tabung Projek Perumahan Terbengkalai or now better known as TPPT. It was established in 1990 and ceased in 1992 after reviving 19,000 units of properties. It used a fund under Tabung Pusingan Perumahan Kos Rendah which was provided by Bank Negara Malaysia. Nowadays, TPPT Sdn Bhd has moved away from its office in Bank Negara itself and is another housing developer in Malaysia which used its early days as reviver of abandon housing projects to sell new and completed houses. Here's a link to its website (a bit outdated though) - TPPT Sdn Bhd.

In the housing industry nowadays, since years ago, we seem to be facing the problem of housing development being abandon long before the housing project is completed. It is a bit of a mystery why a law which was enacted since 1970s didn't address the issue of abandon projects. What the law before 2007 had was clauses which ask housing developer to have RM200,000 in its Housing Development Account at any one time and this is the only money supposedly they need to maintain if they want to be in operation. There are penalties which the enforcing authority under Kementerian Perumahan dan Kerajaan Tempatan (KPKT) imposed but are usually paid by the culprits of abandon housing developments without any problem.

The amendments to the Housing Development (Control and Licensing) Act 1966 in 2007 was supposed to add additional penalties and address the issue of abandon housing development. It did stop the fly-by-night establishment of new property developer who circumvent the law by being a bit clever. Here was the scenario in early days of the 2000s. These law benders, some of them have legal background, circumvented the law by building houses without being penalised. The law stated that any person who build more than four (4) houses and sell it for profit is considered to be a housing developer and whatever they do is considered to fall under the housing development law. What these developer did was to sell bungalow plot without any property built on them under one agreement and another agreement is signed for a bungalow to be built on the property. So, they became outside the law before the amendment in 2007 which states that any housing development that KPKT found to be similar to housing development will fall under its purview.

Now, the first bill of the amendments to curb the housing development is on its way through Parliament. The news on 17th November in The Star Property mentioned among other that fines will be increased to RM50,000-00, housing developer need to refund cancelled Sale & Purchase Agreement within 30 days with fine starting from RM250,000-00 and RM5,000-00 for each day of non-compliance and the best of all, the Housing Development Account will now be 3% of the housing project development total cost and not just RM200,000-00. 

I find the new law to be refreshing as it will ensure only housing developer with deep pockets to enter into the business of housing development. There will be complains about certain housing developers to not being able to meet the requirement and we can already hear the Real Estate and Housing Developer Association (REHDA) breathing down the neck of the Minister trying to tweak the Act to suit them but I really hope KPKT and Attorney General office will stand firm on these amendments. National House Buyers Association (HBA) will agree to the amendments as they have been fighting for so long for a solution to the issue of abandon housing projects problem. Here are one of their view on abandon project : Cleaning up abandoned or stalled housing projects

In the meantime, I am also hoping that another effort will be made by the government on all the abandoned housing developments around the Malaysia. The last I heard it was spearheaded by Syarikat Perumahan Negara Berhad (SPNB) which is also tackling the issue of affordable housing. The problem with an institution such as this is when they have to deal with the state governments which sometimes are a bit slow in giving their approval to help the process along. My suggestion is either an institution like Danaharta or TPPT should be given all-encompassing power again or SPNB should be given more power and allocation which can take over and manage the abandon housing development.

November 10, 2011

Google+ Page of Khairul, Suhaila & Hazlina

I have always believe in utilising social media even before the term was popular. When I was told by a friend about Google+ Page, which is kind of but not exactly like Facebook Page, I straight away jumped at the opportunity to create my medium sized legal firm's Google+ Pages. Unlike the unsearchable Facebook Page, here's a searchable alternative.

Khairul, Suhaila & Hazlina's Google+ Page 

Or, if you are more into Facebook :

Khairul, Suhaila & Hazlina's Facebook Page

Here is the Google+ Page for my book :

Ask the Lawyer!'s Google+ Page

and the Facebook page :

Ask The Lawyer's Facebook Page

And for the past two weeks, I have been appearing in articles in online and offline publication. One is an interview by the Sun, a local newspaper about my book and they took excerpt from 5 questions which can be found in my book and another one where I was interviewed by Malaysian Insider, a local online news portal, about affordable housing in Malaysia (they got my name spelled wrong - 'Anuar' was spelled as 'Anwar' and I gave more leads which the reporter followed through than actually giving much about subject matter itself)

The Sun's interview picture :

and the link to the Malaysian Insider article :

Affordable housing the new way to win votes in Malaysia

October 24, 2011

Real Property Gain Tax in 2012

The 2012 Malaysia Budget was announced a few weeks ago and one of the thing that was announced was the change in the Real Property Gain Tax in 2012. In order to understand the tax that was levied before, let us go a bit further. Pre-2009, the time before the Real Property Gain Tax was tweaked to inject some excitement into the property players in Malaysia. 

The Real Property Gain Tax was not what it was today. It was a charge of a whooping 30% for any property disposed 2 years from the date it was bought (the date on the Sale & Purchase Agreement or whatever form of transfer which allow a person to own land in Malaysia). It goes down as the year goes up. 20% for the third year disposal; 15% for fourth year disposal and 5% for fifth year disposal. And after the 6th year, no tax is levied. Here's a little secret, this Rates of Tax was NEVER repealed. It was just suspended by a decree in Parliament and it was passed through debate. And it was done in 2009 for the Budget 2010.

The change in 2009 was as a measure to excite the market and the market was excited that it got confused when the rate was 5% for only some of the years and not across the board. Under pressure, an announcement was made at the end 2009 so that any sale done by anyone after January 2010 was taxed at 5% whatever the year it was disposed. That is much, much lower than the 30% right? However, the government does want you to pay the 5% regardless whether you will be taxed or not. As long as you sell your property and make a chargeable gains or simply said, a profit, you need to pay that 5%. Only after looking through all the documents filed by your lawyer or yourself, and if you profit is not taxable according to the rates of tax, only then will the money be refunded.

Then, a change is now at hand which will be in force in 2012. For any property sold after it was purchase for 2 years, a 10% tax is levied. That is not so bad right? Just hold the property you have invested in to make money for 2 years and then sell the property. If you don't have the time to wait, factor in your Real Property Gain Tax cost into your profit. And there are other factors you can add into the selling price of the property. All your cost to buy, maintain and even sell the property can be factor in. Such as your legal fees, your renovation cost and your advertisement cost (even your real estate agent cost). When you send your Real Property Gain Tax form, send the Inland Revenue Department the receipts for all the said item. And please remember, you can get once-in-lifetime exemption for the property you have lived in all your life which you consider as your private residence.

Although the change in the tax regime for property acquisition is good, it will not help speculators to stop speculating. Government seems to forget a few things when they formulate their strategy. They still have not make property ownership easier for those who are under the Malaysia My Second Home campaign. For now, the participants of the scheme need only to put in some money and show proof of the deposit. They should just tweak it so that they are allowed to buy properties in certain areas and put in a caveat about when and how it can be transferred. That can create ripple effect for that area and maybe a new set of tax rate can also be levied on them. Please remember that Malaysia still has one of the cheapest property prices in the region (in contrast with Singapore and Hong Kong)

October 6, 2011

Altium @ Damansara Perdana

Does Petaling Jaya need a skyscraper? Actually, there is no real skyscraper in Petaling Jaya and that Telekom Tower you see when you use the Federal Highway is not one. That is in Kuala Lumpur. A few weeks back, I was invited to the launch of a new skyscraper in Petaling Jaya, specifically at the busy and vibrant Damansara area. It was also to announce the ambassador for this new commercial building. 

The said commercial development is The Altium at Damansara Perdana. And the said ambassador is non other Jojo Struys, better known as a TV personality and columnist with The Star. The developer for the project is AQRS, The Building Company.

The Altium is a unique building which marries Green and Technology. The Altium consist of three main components. The Prime, a 22-level Grade-A MSC compliant green corporate office; The CEO Suites, 12-level SOVO Suites, a lifestyle and work solution business suites and The Pulse, a 3-tiered retail and F&B podium, a place for social and business networking.

To see more of the Altium, here is The Altium homepage.

September 13, 2011

Mind-fucking students' mind

What do you actually do when you go to university?

Learn? Yeah, right. Only 10% of all students really study at all time. The other time? They will be hanging around doing nothing and some even goes the distance doing various delinquencies. Where else most people learn how to smoke pot.

I was not the naughtiest or the learned student in my batch of '98. I studied locally and I never work for anyone. I build my business from scratch and the road was not rosy at all. So, I do know a few thing about being an entrepreneur. Not being related to any royalty or politician in Malaysia will take me longer to drive that Ferrari.

My ranting above is related to an experience I had this morning. 

I was asked to be a part of a project related to making local university's students to think outside the box. As I was busy bullshitting the student council members who was enraptured with whatever all that I can think of including embracing social media and even a dose of real life situation vs. life in the university, the lecturers who is supervising them came in.

I bet she was horrified at what I was telling the students. Especially when I told them about their alumni members who are now making a living by singing and doing public relations unconventionally.

She then expertly divert the students attention to the need to use their mind to focus on how to read case law while applying various techniques to do more research. I did divert her mind that I do understand their need to be educators by saying the alumni members used their legal trained mind to apply it to their everyday business.

I tweeted just now, I think as much as the project is under the patronage of their Vice Chancellor, the best way to make the students competitive when they enter the job market in one or two years with a high income is to make them realised that the world out there is big and a law degree doesn't help you gain more money or even make you get ahead of your career unless you really apply common sense and teach the teachers to think outside the box.

At the back of my mind, I was actually thinking, the students who are now successful adult, no thanks to the oppressive nature they were asked to learn, are what they are due to the oppression. Whatever it is, when the slot I was given comes, the only way I can make them see the way the can be successful is to mind-fuck their young minds. 

Only then can they truly see the light...

August 28, 2011

Hari Raya pictures from KSH

As people nowadays rarely take pictures for Hari Raya, our small legal firm decided to hold a picture taking session with us wearing proper baju Melayu and baju kurung, the traditional dress of Malaysians. It starts off with us clowning around, then a proper group pictures, pictures of the departments in our firm  and then a stand alone picture for most of us. As a firm, small gestures and event like this makes the bond stronger.


Have a great Eidul Fitri from all of us
Custom Search